Welcome!

Welcome to Deus Meus, Rex Meus, Dominus Meus, a personal blog dedicated to the Catholic Theology, Philosophy, and Literature, though it is also likely to see me sharing some thing not so related to Catholicism yet I personal find to be interesting.

Here are the general statements of myself:

(1) I am a Traditionalist Catholic, and more specifically, a Sedevacantist. I reject the legitimacy of "Popes" since 1958. This includes John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli), Paul VI (Giovanni Montini), John Paul I (Albino Luciani), John Paul II (Karol Wojtyla), Benedict XVI (Josef Ratzinger), and Francis I (Jorge Bergoglio). I reject Vatican Two Theology and Novus Ordo Liturgy, which are absolutely anti-Catholic, thus rejecting the legitimacy of the whole V2-NO Sect. 

(2) I reject the recognize-resist position of Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii X (FSSPX), a position that cannot find justification through any classical Catholic teachings.

(3) I reject every single Indult liturgy. I hold the belief that all the Indult groups, such as Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Petri (FSSP), Institutum Christi Regis Summi Sacerdotis (ICRSS), and others, as completely false traditionalists. Their mission is not to wake people up and help them recognize the intrinsic problems of the theology of the V2-NO Sect, but to deceive them by providing the so-called "Latin Mass" and insisting (either explicitly or implicitly) that the traditional liturgy and modern liturgy are the same liturgy, but only in two different forms. Using Father William Jenkins' words: "The Indult groups are not only making an argument for Ecumenism, but also are embodying the principles of Ecumenism, since they are insisting that a Catholic liturgy and a non-Catholic liturgy can be perfectly compatible with, or even enriching, each other." This is Latin Mass-ism. Being a Catholic is far more than going to a Latin Mass, yet those Indult groups are leading souls to Hell by telling them everything is fine, as long as there is a Latin Mass.

(4) I disagree with the position of Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii V (SSPV) that the Thuc-line Bishops and Priests are invalid and participating in Thuc-line Mass is schismatic. On the contrary, I hold that Bishop Mark Pivarunas of Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae (CMRI), Bishop Michel Louis Guerard Des Lauriers, Bishop Robert McKenna, as well as many other Thuc-line Bishops and Priests, though not all of them, are valid and licit. 

(5) I do not subscribe to the position mainly proposed by Bishop Daniel Dolan, Bishop Donald Sanborn, and Father Anthony Cekada that it is a mortal sin to attend a Una Cum Mass, though I am open to accept this position in the future, if I am convinced in my study.

(6) I do not hold that we have the authority to reject the 1955 Holy Week Reform, though I believe that a true Pope in the future will restore the pre-1955 Holy Week Liturgy. 

(7) I still recognize the SSPX as a Traditionalist Catholic organization, and recognize the followers of the SSPX in general as Traditionalist Catholics. However, I believe the SSPX recognize-resist position is very dangerous for the Catholic Faith, especially for the Faith of those young Catholics, since it denies supernatural nature, including the Four Marks as well as Infallibility and Indefectibility, of the Holy Roman Catholic Church and enthrones Menzingen (the city where the SSPX is headquartered) over Rome as the magisterial authority.

I recommend you to start reading the scholarly research Work of Human Hands by Father Cekada as a starting point, then you see how sinister the modern reformations (read: "deformations") were and will understand why rejecting the new liturgy is not merely a personal preference, but a matter of the Catholic Faith.

May God bless you all!

Gulielmus Pius Robertus Winslowius